Many young people nowadays tend to put things off.
Why is this the case?
What are the consequences?
What can these people do to avoid procrastination?
In this day and age, procrastination is popular in most young people. This tendency stems from the time deficiency and undetermined attitudes of young people, which leads to several repercussions and require corresponding measures to eliminate.
Apparently, people delay what they are doing in light of a lack of time and effort. In a fast paced life these days, humans struggle with a load of tasks on a daily basis and they do not have enough time to complete all the work. Therefore, they tend to postpone some missions on the side and do it later. In addition, teenagers usually do not endeavor to accomplish their intended mission because of laziness or other distractions. Take the attraction of social platforms as an example, people can easily put off their work immediately if they see a compelling video or movie on Facebook or Tiktok.
This tendency can lead to numerous consequences in terms of opportunities and results. Regarding the chances, young people will blow their opportunities to climb up the career ladder if they do not finish tasks on the given time. For instance, if a task is contributed for all staff in a company, the person who completes is able to stand a chance and the others procrastinate will not be successful. Furthermore, procrastination can give rise to unsatisfactory products when the time is inefficient, people just finish their process at the last minute. To address this tendency, humans can plan their schedule in a reasonable method which is easy to follow as well as endeavor to accomplish their assigned task.
To sum up, although procrastination happens in a large number of teenagers resulting in an amount of problems, people can tackle this by their effortlessness and having a practical timetable.
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarise the information by selecting and report 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh their assigned task. To sum up, although procrastination happens in a la...
^^
Line 8, column 49, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...p, although procrastination happens in a large number of teenagers resulting in an amount of pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06872852234 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10411821412 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2327547679 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263918895646 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911849531584 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482300911775 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143232717643 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324102246881 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.