Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is claimed that young people nowadays switch their job fairly regularly over the year. It is argued by many that this phenomenon is attributed mainly to the wish of seeking new working environment in the young. In this essay, I intend to explore the major causes of this problem and whether this modification brings benefit or not to them.
There are some rationales why people change their jobs for the sake of experiencing new working environment. Firstly, young people may find it boring to do rituals day by day, while others may collide with their boss or colleagues, which causes them to distressed and frustrated. Additionally, low salary and long term stagnant salary may also contribute to this issue. The youth are the ones who are energetic and creative, thus a working environment with unfriendly and closed system will not be intimately bound up with them. Therefore, they seek more challenging opportunities with better working environment and facilities that the previous one lacks of.
On the upside, the good and suitable new jobs will induce interest, passion and motivation for the young. New working environment leads them to be more curious and to discover more. Better salary, on the other hand, makes their physical life much better. On top of that, collision will definitely be refrained from in the new corporation with no conflict between employees and between employees and the boss.
Regarding the drawbacks of job shifts frequently, it may be a huge cost of not only the employees but also the corporation. In terms of job seekers, job shifts will bring about cost of changing their house and loss of time. Changing into a new job, furthermore, will have deleterious impact on promotion in career path. Corporations also face a giant cost of recruiting new employees, training staffs and making them familiar with new posts. That workers give up their jobs, moreover, put off the whole workflow and consequently slow down the prosperity of the corporation.
In conclusion, jobs and careers switching contains benefits as well as drawbacks. I think that youngsters should carefully evaluate their companies and the opportunities that can be got at first to ensure that it is an ideal place to grow and get promoted in the long term rather than always taking shifts in jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-19 | huynhphuochai | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Vo Phan Minh Hieu | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | meetmiyani123 | 22 | view |
| 2018-09-23 | honza | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | danial08cse | 78 | view |
- In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
- In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 67
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...s benefits than current jobs. The youth are the ones who are energetic and creative...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06801007557 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74104724042 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569269521411 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4212172437 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.85 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221797955698 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713482783367 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737672852898 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125559501587 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809842419836 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.