Many young people today know more and more international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country. Why is this? What can be done to increase one’s interest in famous people in the history of their country?
It is admitted that nowadays numerous young people tend to have more interests in public celebrities than historic figures in the past. I would discuss some possible causes leading to this scenario as well as potential measures to tackle with it.
With the unprecedented development of social media and technology, the popularity and coverage of international pop figures have been widely spreading, which contribute to young people’s zeal towards pop stars and their ignorance to the national historic ones. It is common that foreign celebrities’ lives and styles are currently grabbing the headlines of most of newspapers, especially the online ones on social media platforms. In fact, the young generations spend much time on surfing social media, they are likely to be exposed to ubiquitous posts unveiling facts or scandals of famous singers or actors, thus they tend to be fascinated about such topics. Moreover, this situation is caused by the tedious teaching method of history subject at school. Indeed, history is not the interest of the majority of students, leading to the fact that students will tolerate the utter boredom if instructor just deliver in conventional and obsolete way.
However, this can come across with various potential approaches to attract the young generations to historic heroes. It is essential to recall proud victories and stories with majestic heroes or creditable people in history by promoting agency and film makers to produce video or movies based on such moments. As a result, youngsters will pay more attention on history as well as will gain more knowledge about the particularly historical events, especially when their idols casted as the main roles. Additionally, the teaching method in history classroom should be adjusted and adapted to the change of modern education in order to arouse students’ interests. Teachers can make the lesson lively and more appealing by displaying vivid images, historical documentary clips or asking students to remake their favorite part of a specific historical event as an assignment instead of verbal explanation.
In conclusion, the common coverage of celebrities on social media and inappropriate teaching way at school cause the imbalanced dispersion between pop stars and famous ones in history. Nevertheless, it can be dealt with by the above suggested solutions.
- Thorough the history people dream to live in a perfect society while they haven t agreed how the ideal society would be like What is the most important element you think to make a perfect society How do people do to achieving an ideal society 89
- The diagram illustrates the process of building an igloo 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
- In the future cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 85
- The diagram below shows how the sand dunes are formed 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the newspapers') or simply say ''most newspapers''.
Suggestion: most of the newspapers; most newspapers
...are currently grabbing the headlines of most of newspapers, especially the online ones on social m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with by the above suggested solutions.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43089430894 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90200503336 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590785907859 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.760005143 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290898862327 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840904829449 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468995235855 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160069047039 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038081647479 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.