The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
No one can deny the indispensable role of media in terms of disseminating information about current issues worldwide. Nevertheless, the media are, more often than not, to blame for psychological problems among societies in virtue of their intention of sensationalism. Hence, many people believe that it is imperative to involve more delightful news. Personally, I am inclined to this statement for some justifications.
Appealing more people to sensational stories, the media must, in turn, violate moral principles. Take, televisions, by the way of example, by which populations are invariably exposed to explicit language, violence or even death. The continuity of displaying these images in part generates an immune to shocking behavior of communities, not least young generations. Consequently, they might become more and more emotionless, finding accidents and desperate situations too normal to render assistance to the victims. In addition, the fact that full volumes in the newspaper are devoted to disastrous information is leading to unstable feelings among people. That is to say, they are preoccupied with insecurity and potential dangers even at home.
Having said that, some people advocate the right of acquiring transparent news, arguing that the media do not force anyone to watch violent news. Viewers are those who should decide whether the information is worth noting or not. Moreover, given the chance of gaining offensive news, people can be cautioned against unexpected circumstances. For example, the news about rapes and murders in India should deter tourists, especially females. from visiting this country. However, I believe these arguments are not completely vivid. While most teenagers are not mature enough to recognize appropriate information, it is a generalization that the whole country will be cited as dangerous with the foundation of individual accidents.
All things considered, granted populations should be reported about true stories, but over-explicit images in the media should not necessarily superior to the good news. we need to keep in mind that television and the newspaper are designed to inform and educate people rather than to erode ethics and frighten viewers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...ne to shocking behavior of communities, not least young generations. Consequently, they m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...uld deter tourists, especially females. from visiting this country. However, I belie...
^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... necessarily superior to the good news. we need to keep in mind that television an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition, by the way, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59940652819 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09823264365 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643916913947 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0664619078 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3157894737 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192996003249 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466516451294 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539459211175 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109981370693 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261756528197 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.