Mobile apps help learn languages. To what extent do you agree?
With the growth of mobile apps’ popularity, we can observe the spread of new types of language learning practices. Although old-school methods, suggesting a tutor and course books, are still the choice of some, I believe that in the future there will be no place for outdated approach, and the mobile apps helping learn a language will be ubiquitous.
The argument against this is that not every age-segment can adapt to technological change, especially the elderly. They learn foreign languages in order to keep their mind clear and avoid dementia. Even though they try to keep up with new technological reality, for many of them it is still complicated to use mobile apps.
However, the industry of online education have been growing exponentially during several decades and has already demonstrated stellar results. There are plenty of new startups, which business models are fully focused on mobile apps as a main product for sale. For example, Coursearea is the worldwide popular app for online education and learning languages, and the local ones, such as LeanguaLeo, mainly known only in Russia. Thus, the market of mobile apps for languages has growing irrevocably.
Another reason, is that mobile apps can remarkably simplify the proccess of language learning. First of all, you can easily find any new unfamiliar word or do a quick research for any information just in five sec. Secondly, you can use mobile app, while you are in transport or in other not suitable for traditional education purposes locations. So, mobiles apps could significantly improve the whole proccess of studying.
In conclusion, it is hard to doubt, that mobile applications are widly used for practice languages. Although not every segment of people feel comfortable with them, we can not ommit the importance of mobile apps in terms of language learning.
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great britain between 1961 and 2001 Write a report summarizing the information Select and describe the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The given graphs illustrate a waste ratio within the family of UK in 1985 and 2002 84
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 90
- Why are people addicted to dangerous sports 60
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'quick research'.
Suggestion: quick research
...sily find any new unfamiliar word or do a quick research for any information just in five sec. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18060200669 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79208333584 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5586765311 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307914005981 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108763933783 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666711637217 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168991659877 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657347176937 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.