In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work and
communicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive
or negative development
The past few decades have witnessed the prevalence of Internet-based
comunication, shopping and transaction activities. From my perspective, this
development presents both positive and negative aspects equally.
On the one hand, the unrestricted access to the Internet has benefited greatly the public for its convenience and comfort. It is undoubted that telecommunication tools including email, instant messaging or social networks facilitate people’s interaction, bringing people closer together. For instance, an international student or a foreign worker in the USA can deliver a message to his friends or family back home in Vietnam, only at the click of a mouse regardless of geographical barriers. Another example is that shoppers can seek out items or services of the finest quality without engaging in lengthy commutes, especial
during extreme weather conditions like torrential rain or scorching heat of the
summer.
On the other hand, certain detriments are associated with the excessive Internet use. The over-reliance on virtual communication is the primary cause of the decline in social skills which are crucial for real-life contact. It is not uncommon for heavy social network users to feel awkward when trying to strike up conversations with strangers or make small talk about social events. Thus, these people might eventually become socially alienated and suffer from a great sense of solitude. Another harmful aspect is the diminished physical and mental condition. The overindulgence in the virtual world would undoubtedly trigger a sedentary lifestyle, which is responsible for a number of health-related problems such as impaired vision, obesity or the inability to process and express emotions.
In conclusion, both positive implications on certain aspects in life and negative impacts on lifestyle and health can be seen considering the uncontrolled Internet use for shopping, working and communication purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- Foreign tourist abroad should be charged more than local people when visiting the local historical and cultural tourist attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagram below shows the process of collecting rain water for use in an Australian town. 89
- With the increased demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should lookfor sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do theadvantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas? 89
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tnessed the prevalence of Internet-based comunication, shopping and transaction a...
^^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on activities. From my perspective, this development presents both positive and n...
^^^
Line 4, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t engaging in lengthy commutes, especial during extreme weather conditions like t...
^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...torrential rain or scorching heat of the summer. On the other hand, certain detr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.73010380623 5.12529762239 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22121727084 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681660899654 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9222539167 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.615384615 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 7.06120827912 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10617608234 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316226252621 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315614002202 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0347654865131 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419347132182 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 22.05 12.4159519038 178% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.