Modern technology has greatly influenced people’s ways of entertainment, making people less creative. Do you agree or disagree?
Modern technology has a significant impact on how people entertain themselves. It is assumed that technology stifles creativity in terms of entertaining activities. In my opinion, I agree with this statement due to several reasons.
Firstly, modern technology has a negative influence on individuals' inspiration to create diverse content for entertainment. The convenience of technology can result in people’s passive consumption of repetitive content. If people become familiar with this type of content, they will be unmotivated to develop new ideas for entertainment. Many people, for example, entertain themselves by watching TikTok, where the algorithm tends to suggest repeated content. Therefore, users who are familiar with the repetition of boring content cannot have any inspiration to create a diversity of entertaining content.
Secondly, modern technology can make people lazier in terms of creativity, especially during entertaining times. Without the help of technology, people in the past could still create outdoor activities to entertain with friends such as hide and seek or tug of war. However, people today are becoming lazier in diversifying ways of entertainment because they have too many options available on the Internet. Thus, less effort is put into inventing new ideas as technology can be sufficient enough to entertain a person.
In conclusion, I believe that modern technology not only influences how people entertain, but also diminishes creative ability. The repetition of content and a large number of options provided by technology can lead to a loss of inspiration and efforts in inventing a variety of entertaining methods.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries health care is free paid for by the state In other countries payment is divided between the state and people themselves Discuss both systems and say which one is better 78
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 73
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... technology has a negative influence on individuals inspiration to create diverse content f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... ability. The repetition of content and a large number of options provided by technology can lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67330677291 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20064913021 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4745679582 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346301695713 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132859536552 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894467600953 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232544805663 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604040996946 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... technology has a negative influence on individuals inspiration to create diverse content f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... ability. The repetition of content and a large number of options provided by technology can lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67330677291 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20064913021 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4745679582 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346301695713 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132859536552 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894467600953 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232544805663 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604040996946 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.