As machines have become more sophisticated, more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Physical jobs or tasks, which include a lot of strength, are now becoming less demanding and can be automatically processed by cutting-edge machines. This trend has benefits and obstacles, but I support the idea that its advantages outweigh its hurdles.
On the one hand, this trend has numerous evolutionary effects on different perspectives of our life, especially on improving the quality of jobs or the work conditions. Workers used to have dangerous working conditions and lacked the equipment to perform their tasks because of gadgets’ insufficiency; thus, they worked inefficiently. However, in today’s time, due to the enhancement of machines, their jobs are becoming less demanding and inquiring less energy because these sophisticated gadgets will replace workers’ duty of finishing tasks and increase the productivity of their work. A worker’s physical strength can’t compare with the speed of machines. Thus, all workers have to do today is supervise machines doing the work and fix problems. Moreover, working conditions are much safer than in the past, and help prevent unpredictable accidents while working in a factory. In a fast-changing world, modern machines support workers with their workplace and the difficulties their demanding jobs cause and improve their living standards.
On the other hand, machines would lessen the number of jobs available for the unemployed. Some people believe that if machines are responsible for 80% of our work duty in a machine, workers are likely to become jobless or get low-paid. Machines make jobs and tasks convenient, but they are likely to increase the percentage of unemployment; thus, more and more people become homeless and live hard life. From different perspectives, this trend’s drawback is not challenging if we utilize machines effectively.
In conclusion, I agree that this trend’s positive contributions outweigh its disadvantage when we know how to make the best of the equipment.
- The diagram below shows how soft cheese is made 73
- The table shows data about underground railway systems in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger numbers per year in millions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where rele 73
- The table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 698, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supervised'.
Suggestion: supervised
.... Thus, all workers have to do today is supervise machines doing the work and fix problem...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50165016502 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08817085416 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2286706975 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339656129595 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10089211104 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057006861718 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171647690284 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508402749654 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.