Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages

Essay topics:

Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?

Over recent years computerisation has approached the imminent merge with all spheres of people’s lives. Artificial intelligence development is replacing more outdated work methods. Although the exposure of employees to risk for injury rises, I believe that introduction of advanced technologies can limit number of people infected by coronavirus.

On one the hand, modernisation makes personnel more susceptible to work accidents. The reason for this is emergence of difficulties that are related with using intricate mechanisms and new devises, so for the exploitation of technical equipment appropriate education is needed. Unfortunately in competitive environment predictably will not companies waste money on staff training, which leads to problems and mistakes threatening people’s healthy and life. For example, the enterprise called DuPont under shareholders’ pressure reduced costs and deferred employees’ instruction and as implication happened mechanical error caused emission of highly toxic chemical. In other words, automation pose a extra risks for workers due to elaborate changes in usual routine.

On the other hand, technological evolution aids in declining rates of the present pandemic. It is possible because of new opportunities that are available within computerisation such as distance work form. Hence internet and special programs offer the required quality of job and at the same time provide measures of social isolation by stoping contacts with colleagues, clients. For instance, according to Center of Moscow Statistics adopting of distance education reduced incidence of COVID-19 among old aged teacher by 47%. Thus, progress of gadgets and softwares creates new methods of decreasing coronavirus tendency.

In addition, I think that technological development can terminate dissemination of mentioned disease, and this fact outweighs all disadvantages, even increasing of work damages.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-24 MEBC Class 89 view
2023-10-31 kevann 84 view
2023-10-12 Mollymaul 80 view
2023-10-05 BoyClazz 78 view
2023-09-07 Vishva2412 73 view
Essays by user rosary123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'company'?
Suggestion: company
...titive environment predictably will not companies waste money on staff training, which le...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'company'
Suggestion: company
...titive environment predictably will not companies waste money on staff training, which le...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...emical. In other words, automation pose a extra risks for workers due to elaborat...
^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...uterisation such as distance work form. Hence internet and special programs offer the...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29570920646 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.709090909091 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6597111043 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0596406626608 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0183367185139 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385770643627 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049614605119 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556545727958 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.64 8.58950901804 136% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.