In the modern world, the image (photograph or film) is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In the modern world, the image (photograph or film) is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In the modern society, communicating with advanced technology such as image has replaced with communicating with verbal form. I personally agree with this phenomenon that photo and film are a more expressive way to communicate than written word with some reasons, which I will explain below.

First and foremost, it would seem that the written word cannot be avoided to communicate the information or to share the knowledge. Firstly, the written form may able to be the evidence of formal reference and agreement in many sectors such as academic and business. If it is used, written communication can become the future reference. Furthermore, the written communication, such as letter, may be more polite to communicate something with relation and supervisor at the office.

However, we should consider that that visual communication would be the more effective way for many kinds of people, particularly illiterate. This demonstrates that illiterate would be easier to understand the information that is presented visually owing to graphs, diagrams, and pictures complex information, figures and data. The second probable benefit of the image is related to time used for communication. Photo and film would assist to prevent the wastage of time since written communication takes quite a lot of time to exchange knowledge and information. The last possible advantage is that the image may be more interesting for many people than the written. The reason often given is that the image has many colors and forms to express its meaning.

In summary it is logical to conclude that the visual communication, such the image, offer the effective way to communicate between people (especially illiterate), the reduction of time consuming, and also the fascinating method to exchange the information. This is provided that we use the written word to communicate each other, when we are in formal situation.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-05-23 sasachic 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, in summary, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33554817276 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04989179079 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521594684385 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5399017682 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250751019157 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923015071271 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590378732091 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155469086065 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443200596431 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.