In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinion is divided on the issue that to what extent humankind are dependent on animals. In my own point of view, based on human history and scientific development, eating meat or using animal-sourced products are not our must-do anymore.
Some proofs have been discovered by the archaeologist that the ancient men did not survive by meats but mostly vegetations during the early era, before the invention of fire. They soon recognized severe diseases and even death were brought by eating raw dead wild animals, which led them to vegan eating habits and the ability to indicate high-calorie and non-toxic fruits. Moreover, not being well-equipped with various weapons, they survived by wearing clothes or sheltering themselves only by plants. This study research has stated the fact that humanity, by our nature and instinct, could live without trading lives of the animals.
However, development in human biology and social activities has required us to digest a multitude and various types of nutrition, especially proteins which some cannot be found in a vegan diet. Furthermore, medical trials and some other fashion needs require involvement of dogs, mouse or crocodiles as a part of an experiment or the main material to the industry. This, in fact, has been gradually addressed and solved by the scientists who have introduced a number of discoveries and innovations as supplants for animal products. Different sources of high-calorie and nutritional artificial food have been proved to be able to be safely absorbed by our bodies. Some animal-involved industries have found various ways to fulfill the consumers’ needs by using natural materials or in-lab and in-vitro experiments.
In conclusion, there are different arguments in terms of the roles of animals towards humanity. My view is that we can build the harmony among us and the wildlife by living independently from other living creatures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | nhathoa | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | khanh202 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | dungdung | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | daniel.funkiee | 84 | view |
- In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38943894389 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97828774817 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2168774382 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.615384615 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106337245823 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037072498789 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409788918276 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075183412401 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561805347202 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.