Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Although in many countries the financial subsidy for postgraduate research is restricted due to a host of reasons, I do not agree with the idea that governments should only sponsor scientific research. Actually, theoretical and humanity researches are also important to the development of the society.
It is understandable that from the perspective of utilisation, experimental research should deserve more financial support. People argue that it is the scientific research that bring about the update of technology, which as a consequence become the driving force of the society. Taking the biological research as an example, which is recognised as one of the most cutting-edge technologies, also need huge budget in purchasing equipment and experimental materials. Therefore, appropriate financial aid is necessary for scientists' further study. In addition, the result of those researches could be profitable in the long run, which will positively stimulate the economic development of a country.
However, despite the fact that experimental science has direct influence on the progress of society, financial support should not only be poured into scientific research. This is mainly because theoretical and humanity subjects such as astronomy, maths or arts, are also of great significance. Firstly, some of the basic subjects offer theoretical basics on engineering and technology. Those subjects such as philosophy and maths, should also be emphasised by the governments. Furthermore, the economic utilisation should not be regarded as the only standard when appraising a country's development. Humanities should also be taken into consideration, which are based on the prosperity of literature and arts. As a result, those subjects' researches also worth subsidies offered by governments.
In conclusion, while scientific research is important and should get sponsorship from the governments, financial supports should also be allocated to other subjects for the sake of developing a well-round society.
- In many countries, there are more people choose to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative development of society? 73
- Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 61
- Some people think painting and drawings are as important as other subjects, they should be compulsory in high school education. What do you think? 89
- More attention is paid to being"responsible tourists" in order to preserve the cultural and environmental aspects of tourist places. However, some people think it is impossible to be a "responsible tourist" in the society. To what exte 73
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people, but some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...re also of great significance. Firstly, some of the basic subjects offer theoretical basics...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81481481481 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2983299718 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548821548822 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4161394859 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.133333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332227959587 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114655090042 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966327118282 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241049064312 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763167495529 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.