Money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. Governments could better spend this money on other things to benefit the nation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the government nowadays is funneling a huge chunk of its budget in space exploration, people often express their dissatisfaction as they opine that the money could be spend to benefit the nations. While I agree with the fact that a nation should use its funds wisely for the betterment of its people before any extraterrestrial project, I also believe the search of the unknown must not be haulted completely, which are expressed in the forthcoming paragraphs as well.
Pitching in for the development of the space sector in competition to deveoped nations can cause detrimental consequences to a third world country. At present, many countries around the globe are facing crisis over issues like poverty, shortage of drinking water, mass hysteria, et cetra and in those condition mobilizing the country's funds in space exploration rather than solving the prevailing problems would not be a wise decision. Furthermore, the collapse of Nepal's economy after investing on a satellite program back in 2015, shows how a developing country should limit its bounds to providing proper facilities to the citizens like healthcare, education and transportation, before wasting its funds in something as irrelevant as space exploration.
In the meantime, developed countries, like the United States, Russia, and Switzerland, should not hold back on the curiosity of space exploration. As these first-world countries have enough disposable funds, setting apart a chunk of it for space exploration would not cause any harm to the economic condition of the nation as well as the people residing there. Furthermore, the dream of space exploration can be credited for many technological advancements made throughout the century, inculding rocket engines, mars rovers and even marsian helicopter, which wouldn't be possible if proper funding to such projects of exploration aren't provided. A recent study by NASA stated that nearly half of the technological advancements open to public were first intended for projects for space expedition, which perfectly exemplifies how current technology is influenced by the space sector.
In conclusion, as the exploration of space has become a race nowdays, the involvent of developing nations to the race despite the declining infrastructures had been a problem, which must be stooped while for first-world nations it has helped in various innovations. Hence, I believe that countries witl smaller economies should limit their investments to smaller projects and focus in upliting the status of nation first, while the ones whith enough disposable funds should keep the curiosity of space exploration alive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-24 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- Many people in poor countries die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication required Do you believe that drug companies should make their products available at reduced prices in these countries 80
- Music is a universal language To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries people do not do enough to recycle their used materials glass paper metal What do you think are the reasons for this What do you think can be done to solve this problem 80
- Some people say that history offers no practical benefit to society while others claim that history teaches us to understand the present Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Giving children pocket money is common in many countries Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of giving pocket money to children 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...e spend to benefit the nations. While I agree with the fact that a nation should use its funds wisely fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...vers and even marsian helicopter, which wouldnt be possible if proper funding to such p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 630, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...funding to such projects of exploration arent provided. A recent study by NASA stated...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, third, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46210268949 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08177106623 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557457212714 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.898588583 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.090909091 106.682146367 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1818181818 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152805701527 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627144118672 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040894469255 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977365370733 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331541658313 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.9 13.0946893788 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.