More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop (e.g. iPad), because they think that children need good technology skills. Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages?
It seems that parents have loosen their restrictions on children's screen time, who believe their exposure to electronic devices is a lesson to be learned from for adjusting themselves to a life on a technological base. In my opinion, parents need to step in when teens start to misuse technology rather than accumulate tech-related skills.
Tech skills, though not embedded in early school education, are necessarily taught at home to help nurture children's problem solving. The project-centric nature of learning technology skills, such as programming applications or developing digital photography portfolios, instills children with the mindset to break down complex problems into small pieces. In the long run, this process would equip them with necessary skills for success in their future career, especially at the onset of their entering the workforce. Undoubtedly, staff are expect to perform multiple tasks on electronic devices, ranging from employing social media platforms, to software development and programme coding. In other words, if one wants to work across divisions in a business and take on more responsibilities, progressing should start from the technology use, even it is just game playing.
Education-oriented environment where children learn how to exchange information online and become proficient at applications is too idealized to be created by parents. In reality, technology addiction in children is impossible to shun, who phenomenally focus more on games, videos and Tiktok sharing than on how to sharpen tech skills. Even if rules and implications that learning should be given priority to by parents are delivered to children, the targets are often hard-to-reach, as teenagers are likely to lose interest in any form of learning itself.
In conclusion, children should be encouraged to embrace the best of technology and use it to strengthen their literacy and cognitive skills; however, parents should take precautions for the possibility of tech addiction and misleading information.
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 73
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'loosened'.
Suggestion: loosened
It seems that parents have loosen their restrictions on childrens screen ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61237785016 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19257127193 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635179153094 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8282329301 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.636363636 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207654390572 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753089867003 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308041851524 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127002097941 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162945992506 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'loosened'.
Suggestion: loosened
It seems that parents have loosen their restrictions on childrens screen ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61237785016 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19257127193 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635179153094 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8282329301 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.636363636 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207654390572 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753089867003 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308041851524 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127002097941 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162945992506 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.