Over the past few decades, offering opportunities for an improved life, downtown areas have attracted more and more people from nearby countryside. Besides certain merits, urban life, however, also provides migrants with some irrigating trouble including expensive cost of living and contaminated air which can be dealt with by stern penalties and certain improvements in terms of factories and transportation.
Admittedly, citizens in metropolitan areas have to face up with some hardness. First of all, prohibitively high cost of living is one of the major demerits. For instance, compared to the countryside where organic food is largely produced in farms, big cities have to spend money purchasing these kinds of food from farmers or importing them from foreign countries. Plus with the increasing demand for healthy food of citizens, prices of these food are grossly inflated, leaving a heavy financial burden on individuals, especially those who have not get used to urban life. Furthermore, moving to downtown areas is synonymous with living in polluted air which is contributed to by fumes from myriads of factories and emission emitted from congested traffic. In the long term, this moves in tandem with the fact that the public have a higher risk of suffering from respiratory diseases such as asthma or even lung cancer. In other words, in comparion with the countryside of which the air is much fresher, urban life is more likely to compromise inhabitants’ well-being.
Nevertheless, some feasible resolutions to the issues should be taken in consideration. Firstly, the governments need to control prices of different items sold in metropolitan ares which can be done by imposing rigid penalty on shop owners who overcharge their customers. These punishments can range from small fines to even forcing them to close their stores. In this way, prices are kept at a reasonable level, allowing migrants to save a large amount of money in order to take a better care of themselves and their families, thereby reaching the ideal life they have always wanted. Moreover, administration should come up with certain rules to control the amount of smoke released into the air. A set of standards, for example, should be created for the process of treating fumes before being emitted into the environment, and only qualified factories are allowed to keep operating. Besides, national budget should be allocated to improving public transportation to attract more commuters and lessen traffic density, thereby reducing emission in the air as well as the level of air pollution.
In conclusion, migrating to cities can lead to an overpriced cost of living and some diseases caused by polluted air. To solve these trouble, certain mesurements should be applied, including enforcing rigid punishments, and advancing transportation and fume treating procedure of factories.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 90
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremelydifficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban lifebetter for everyone 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 76
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...for healthy food of citizens, prices of these food are grossly inflated, leaving a heavy f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...ividuals, especially those who have not get used to urban life. Furthermore, moving...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 41.998997996 200% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 453.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34657836645 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95464862404 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565121412804 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5559301508 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.555555556 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3888888889 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228308440429 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663832420587 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553638616705 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148804740214 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365707249214 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...for healthy food of citizens, prices of these food are grossly inflated, leaving a heavy f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...ividuals, especially those who have not get used to urban life. Furthermore, moving...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 41.998997996 200% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 453.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34657836645 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95464862404 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565121412804 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5559301508 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.555555556 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3888888889 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228308440429 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663832420587 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553638616705 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148804740214 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365707249214 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.