More and more people are moving away from agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work. What will be the consequence of this? What solutions can you offer?
Nowadays, a majority of people occupying agricultural field prefer to seek job vacancy in the city. There are several effects and feasible solutions for this phenomenon, which I will elaborate more below.
Regarding the effects, people choosing to look for a job in the city than village may lead a nation to experience reduced local production and imported product reliance. Apparently, domestic price groceries soared is detrimental to both farmers and society (housewives). Subsequently, those who live in lower middle class are unable to purchase staple diet. Furthermore, high unemployment rate due to overpopulation induces more competitive and thus employment. jobless will generally undertake crimes to earn dollars. According to Research And Development (RAND) Corporation, by age 35, 64% of unemployed men have been arrested and 46% have been convicted of a crime.
Turning to solutions, the government, especially Ministry of Agriculture, should promote modernisation of science and technology in agricultural sector, such as in Vietnam, to attract young generations. In connection with that, ones will cope with climate change adaptation and enhance greater innovation quality compared to non-local products. In addition, not only codifying a law enforcement of urbanisation but also establishing regional infrastructure development would combat such issue. The equity of public facilities evolves job creation and prosperity for the local residents. To illustrate, China is one of successful countries in the tangible progress of rural construction by innovation system of agricultural productivity.
In conclusion, the effects of migrating to city for seeking new job amongst farmers may include overpriced stocks of food source and rivalled job opportunities for city-dwellers. Meanwhile, the reasonable solutions are improving agriculture’s image as well as implementing better rural infrastructure framework.
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
- In many cities planners tend to arrange shops schools offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 84
- Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages with the environmental problems associated with this 84
- Many companies sponsor sports to advertise their products or service What advantages and disadvantages does this bring for the teams and individuals that these companies sponsor 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d imported product reliance. Apparently, domestic price groceries soared is detri...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Jobless
...s more competitive and thus employment. jobless will generally undertake crimes to earn...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n system of agricultural productivity. In conclusion, the effects of migrating ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95323741007 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38678759456 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690647482014 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4532038833 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160992441009 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461095076822 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501271429958 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103528808523 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543927107792 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d imported product reliance. Apparently, domestic price groceries soared is detri...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Jobless
...s more competitive and thus employment. jobless will generally undertake crimes to earn...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n system of agricultural productivity. In conclusion, the effects of migrating ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95323741007 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38678759456 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690647482014 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4532038833 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160992441009 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461095076822 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501271429958 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103528808523 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543927107792 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.