Today, more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as sahara desert or Antrarctica. What are the benefits and disadvantages of going there?
Nowadays, the majority of travellers increasingly explore adrenaline-challenging tourism sites such as Sahara desert and Antarctica. There are several advantages and disadvantages from this phenomenon, which I will elaborate more below.
Regarding the benefits, with vacation abroad, the number of tourists defines self-worth after their hustle and bustle activities with astonishing tourist attraction. In connection with that, there is a sense of intrepid explorer that only few can experience such rare vacation. By completing their trips offered is the way to share in public how they achieve their satisfaction in life. Furthermore, the exotic tourism destinations visited by international travellers (Oasis and Temple tours in Sahara) would earn extra incomes to local guides. Not only this becomes main livelihoods but also succeeds in maintaining sustainable tourism development.
Conversely, this view might show drawbacks that there lies many heavy consequences when choosing very rare vacation areas, in spite of a wonderful view such places offer. Being in extreme cold weather, Antartica, for instance, can carry out threats including hypothermia and snow blindness, in which visitors are obliged to well-equipped tools and excellent health. In addition, this could damage the environment that was originally never touched by humans. With visitors coming over times, the infrastructures are built to facilitate travelling activities. Sadly, this might disturb the local fauna during breeding season and endanger the unspoiled area (garbage scattered).
In conclusion, the positive sides of international travelling to pristine lands may include the great satisfaction for visitors and better prosperity for the natives. Meanwhile, the drawbacks of this must be considered as well.
- Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many first year university students discover after they have started their course that their chosen subjects do not suit them Why does this happen What can be done to ensure that students can choose a suitable subject 90
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phones cellphones apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...humans. With visitors coming over times, the infrastructures are built to facilit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91923076923 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18699975771 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.34247529 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101615183249 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299223761817 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401781352115 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648617232837 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643718536897 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.