More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?
It is true about that urban civilizations have had a trend of owning their houses with small rooms, and without outside places, such as gardens. While some people say that the trend will have serious impacts on communities, but I agree with those who argue that to have a small house in a city will have advantages rather than disadvantages.
Firstly, citizens have tiny properties, where they are still comfortable and happy, leading to decrease of a burden from finance aspects. It is precise that when people, who require their homes having to be bigger and more refurbishments, probably will receive higher pressures from financial invoices, especially cities, where are crowded and extremely economical. Besides that, maintenance for their houses is also a big consideration. For example, with a huge building and a fanny garden, an owner should pay a ton of fees for cleaning and repairing these things.
Then, in high technological and economical development, cities will provide more facilities like gym, as well as public areas, for those who are looking for social demands, such as social activities, environmental experiences. It is a significantly advantage for citizens in which they can achieve two main objectives related to budgets and human demands. Other than that, this trend will encourage people to go outside of their safe zones and will provide social relationships between them, turning to the fact that the communities of urban areas will become more and more friendly.
In conclusion, citizens are unnecessary to have mammoth properties with variety inside and outside facilities, when they can receive all benefits from the cities with the lower costs and more convenient public areas.
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development? 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement- making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ngs. Then, in high technological and economical development, cities will provide more f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('advantage') instead of another adjective.
...ities, environmental experiences. It is a significantly advantage for citizens in which they can achieve ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, still, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29197080292 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8720285754 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4595081944 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158098652697 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584318263264 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487359399313 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102482258591 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348254403152 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.