More women become full-time workers, while men tend to stay at home. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative development?
While gender equality has gained traction recently, discussion about the roles of women and men in families has emerged as a topic of interest. This essay will demonstrate a host of factors that may contribute to this phenomenon, as well as my own opinion on the given topic.
There are many compelling reasons why family roles have changed recently. First of all, feminist movements, which fight for women's rights, act as a precursor to the confidence of women in being full-time workers. In addition, thanks to the advancement of human society, insights into genders are much less conservative than they used to be in the past. This allows males and females to separate from the traditional position that was reserved for each gender only and switch their roles with each other. Consequently, more women immerse themselves in the workplace and men tend to be stay-at-home fathers.
I would contend them this development is advantageous to a certain extent. As the prejudice of genders has been removed, both men and women stand a better chance of doing what they are expert at and desirable about. For example, some men, in fact, passionate about cooking rather than working with computers. By contrast, household works could place a burden on many women as they dream of being managers or doctors. Without outdated notions, people could completely express themselves and perform with their best abilities in families.
In conclusion, gender rights and feminism help men and women participate in families with their suitable roles as I assert that it would be a positive development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14230769231 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74630197834 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8958332873 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271524495525 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854851781827 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071245641648 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147936076705 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541845802368 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.