The most important aim of science ought to be to improve people’s lives.
Scientists are pushing back the frontiers of knowledge every day and we have harnessed science to tackle our daily tasks. Some argue that the primary purpose of science should be enhancing the living standards of humans. I completely agree with this idea and in this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.
Those who contend that sometimes scientists do the research just in the hope of adding to their knowledge. They consider science as a fundamental tool to fulfill their curiosity instead of imagining how their discoveries will benefit the general populace. A standout example of this would be the invention of Laws of Motion when Issac Newton was only curious about the reason behind the fall of an apple. For the average researcher, concentrating on understanding the functional role of nature is a valid and potentially productive mindset. However, this interpretation of science does not reflect the real-world demands placed on science.
On the other hand, science has always been a platform to improve the lives of ordinary people in many aspects. Throughout history, it has helped mankind conquer dangerous plagues such as the Black Death pandemic or Covid-19. When it comes to technology, science can be seen as subordinate to the arts and the enjoyment of the average person. The entire purpose of developing technologies such as mobile phones and computers is to allow users to broaden their horizons, entertain, and connect with others. Therefore, the highest aim of science is ultimately only to help humans boost their self-growth.
Overall, the foundation of science should be improving life and other purposes can not represent its origin. Scientists should focus on research for the benefit of humanity to help our society develop better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | 123456abcxyz | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | trinhthanh1 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-24 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification 89
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree with that statement 84
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...potentially productive mindset. However, this interpretation of science does not ...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity to help our society develop better.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24561403509 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81037956557 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628070175439 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9450073605 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208109000191 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065224247944 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751115654127 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119799419811 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485377225642 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.