Most scientific inventions and discoveries are worthless and only waste of time and money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, evolution in the field of science and technology is considered by many as misuse of time and monetary resources. I completely disagree with the given notion and believe that some scientific researches have benefited human beings to a great extent.
To begin with, some recent breakthroughs in the science sector are advantageous for the governments and individuals. Advancement in the field of technology such as the internet has ameliorated living standards of people. To be more specific, with the internet, people can communicate with anyone, regardless of the distance, whereas in the past Communications were limited to the people in proximity. Moreover, some inventions in the energy sector have enabled individuals to use renewable sources of energy such as solar, wind and hydraulic energy.
Furthermore, treatment of some incurable ailmemts has become possible because of highly advanced technology equipments. Thus, the life expectancy of people has increased as compared to the past. As far as governments are concerned, they can become more prosperous and renowned in the world by conducting some rigorous scientific projects. For instance, recently India has launched a lunar orbiter called "Chandarayan 2" and with this India has become the first nation who sent a orbitar to the south polar region of the moon. Besides this, since relation between different nations are becoming fragile, researches in the sector of arms industries are becoming essential in order to strengthen defence system of countries.
Admittedly, some researches such as development of artificial human cells and exploration of life on other planets are considered as a waste of time and funds because of their impotent results. However, the proportion of such discoveries is limited as compared to the plethora of potential findings.
To conclude, it is clear that some scientific innovations are indeed beneficial for individuals and governments in terms of improved communication, use of renewable energy sources, advanced medical treatments and strong defence system. Thus, it seems to me that scientific inventions are propitious rather than a waste of resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-14 | bkhang29 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | Rudraksha surve | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | chathurika | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-08 | code6127 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | tominhduc | 92 | view |
- Students fron disadvantaged families and rural areas are finding it difficult to get a university education Some people believe that universities should help them To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Most scientific inventions and discoveries are worthless and only waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ement in the field of technology such as the internet has ameliorated living stan...
^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ia has become the first nation who sent a orbitar to the south polar region of th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, for instance, such as, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61746987952 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13084262935 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3823788857 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0942144974921 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330860675401 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422636171224 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631833151085 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419267757679 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.