Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that it is of necessity for museums or art galleries to display the works of art from their own country rather than ones from other cultures. While I utterly concur with this view, I am strongly convinced that exhibition of historical picture from other civilizations is extremely essential. An artifact from their own country helps inhabitants to understand completely about historical stories, appreciating what they have, the works from different countries help people to enhance their knowledge.
To begin with, it has been widely demonstrated that the works of art or historical relics for domestic cultures should be prioritized over those from other civilizations, which can help citizens or visitors to comprehend fully difficult situation in the past or the historical stories during in the war period. A good example of this, nowadays, people live in the peace and democracy. As a result, if inhabitants or visitor can look at the picture, which depicts starvation in the past, they will appreciate what they have. In other words, people will take pride in their origin owing to overcoming this starvation and constructing the museums to exhibit the works of historical art.
On the other hand, it can be said without exaggeration that the works from other civilizations should be not overlooked because of the benefit it can bring about such as expanding the knowledge for everyone. In reality, society is more and more in integration, for this reason, there are a lot of profound insights about historical foreign cultures is of necessity. This can be evidenced by my sister, being adopted an interview in the biggest enterprise in Korea because she possesses a huge amount of information in terms of this historical country. As a consequence, the exhibition of works from other cultures is extraordinarily essential for visitors.
In conclusion, while some may advocate the idea of museums concentrating on preserving the culture of their own country, I believe that historical object from other civilizations should be also included. In my perspective, the manager of museums should display both cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | baokhuyen759 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- In some countries more and more people are being interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2514619883 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02437008391 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1201164843 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260220641694 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102761332008 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914565121474 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171492862207 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590399546862 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.