Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on
university education.
In recent years, there is a contradictory view among the people, who are behaviorally modern
Homosapiens, in the current education system. Some claim that the countries should prioritize vocational
training over higher education, however, in my point of view, though there are compelling economic
reasons to support this idea, the university’s program holds greater value.
To commence with, those who advocate that professional courses are significantly important may point
out the financial benefits. This is because of the fact that such courses are much cheaper and faster in
order to accomplish much more in less time frame. Moreover, it is useful to ease students into steady
employment immediately. For instance, positions like hairdresser, hotel managers, and skilled
technicians, who have established in such job instead of university programs, do not have to deal with
incumbent debts. In contrast, if individual has been studying in the university, the pressure associated
with university life should be struggled with. As a result, each person can complete such skill training and
set aside much more money to run his own business.
Nevertheless, young talents are supposed to be provided by university courses in order to fulfill individuals
and improve society’s abilities. The significance lies in the fact that can be found when a community who
owns such engineers to be secure in a competitive age, when most countries tend to show off it is power
to other ones. Consequently, this program might open up a window opportunity to explore a variety of
fields fitted by the individual’s interests and assist the state to grow at steep paths in the world market.
Furthermore, it is important to be more successful compared with others such as the UK who has been
acted as a global leader due to forefront technology and highly talented manpower.
To sum up, despite the prominence of skill training positions in terms of reduction in expenditure that
have to be dealt with by each person, governments ought to support higher education yet evet in dark
economic times in order to reap future rewards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Trang Hạnh | 80 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education 89
- Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 67
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 37, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...nt out the financial benefits. This is because of the fact that such courses are much cheaper and faste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32551319648 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00880337043 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9913650162 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.692307692 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150747738229 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048259573689 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451861345566 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0380657075055 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454189777887 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.