The utilization of free time by children has been a topic of discussion for quite a long time, and still there exists controversy regarding the topic. While some feel that they should be engaged in organized activities, others think they should be let free completely. Both views have their own significance, and hence a detailed discussion is needed before framing a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, the former group highlights the importance of systematic growth and development of both body and mind when children are made engaged in organized activities at their free time. To be precise, such activities are designed in such a way that it suits the physical, mental and even emotional development of a child. For example, the duration, type and rules of organized activities help children to grow up in a highly-systematic manner. This also helps them to develop emotional maturity and to understand the balance between competition and co-operation in life.
On the other hand, there are people who feel that children should have their own freedom in choosing their activities when they get free time. They believe so because the attitudes and interests of each child would not be always similar. For instance, some children find it interesting to dance, while some prefer to play puzzles when they are free. It is necessary to allow them to explore their hidden talents and shape their interests in the best possible way. This would help children to gain confidence and to enjoy a sort of independence in their life.
After analysing both views in detail, as children benefit from both the circumstances, I feel they should experience both and gain the best out of these. However, whatsoever the activity is, it should be properly supervised.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i feel, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07931034483 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83608688563 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548275862069 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0651098784 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425838374464 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136105629421 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916995587587 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255900253956 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939364994197 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.