Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Animal testing is essential for medical and scientific purposes. While some people are of the opinion that testing on animals is completely wrong, others opine that this is necessary for human safety.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of animal testing. Firstly, many special medical discoveries involved in animal experiments. Before providing new products or medicines to citizens, those products must be tested to ensure their safety to humans. Secondly, reliable alternative to animal testing may not always available. It is better for an animal to suffer than for a human to die.
On the other hand, testing on animals is furious. Human being has no right to conduct experiments on animals. Since some kind of animal in some nations express the belief and are main symbols. Using them for any purpose can be contradict the rules. Furthermore, with science and technology becoming significantly innovation and development, scientist should use the alternative methods of research. It is possible for them to create and invent new method to test the safety products and new medicines.
In conclusion, it seems to me that endorsing products by using such method can be positive as well as negative. Hence, this approach should be regulated and governments should ban dangerous experiments as they can destroy the natural environment.
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries 73
- Some companies sponsor sports events as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think it has some disadvantages Discuss both views and give your own idea 73
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries 73
- The graph shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France Russia and America between 2000 and 2015 67
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27906976744 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81890396753 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613953488372 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2651514796 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6666666667 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382165160295 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117634567082 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589535654744 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219674896051 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432124279692 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.