Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The topic of testing products’ safety on animals has been the subject of enduring debate, drawing attention and discourse over the years. While some people adhere to the position that animal testing is morally wrong, others argue that these experiments benefit the developments of new medicines. In this essay. i will examine both sides of the argument before concluding that i am inclined to support the later opinion
On the one hand, subjecting animals to painful experiments in the pursuit of human benefits is cruel and unethical. Each year, thousands of animals, including rats, rabbits, frogs, monkeys and birds, are forced in the laboratories for biological lessons, medical training and studies, suffering the pain from chemicals and toxic substances to make sure that medicines and products are cleared for humans to use. These animals might become disabled, or have their skin burnt or even lose their natural habitats after these experiments, leading to immense psychological distress. In addition, opponents of such study argue that the life of all creatures should be respected, and scientists must look for alternative methods of research to reduce the amount of animals killed by product testing
Notwithstanding these arguments, I am convinced that animal testing offers several advantages. Foremost among these is its organs. animals are very close to humans when it comes to DNA. Therefore, testing on them provides insight into humans, which helps with the study of how genes work, and furthermore side effects that products might have on us. In fact, it is better for an animal to suffer than a human to die. Thanks to animal testing, science has achieved many outstanding achievements, which save millions of lives. This can be exemplified by the invention of IVI’s oral vaccines, which included experiments on rabbits and mice, that helped reduce the cholerae disease outbreak worldwide. Personally, I feel that it may be a necessity where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, while banning animal testing presents distinct advantages concerning humanity, I am of concrete opinion that using animal experiments has far more benefits
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- perccentage of water used for diferent purposes in six areas of the world
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 67
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 89
- Countries should produce food for their own citizens and limit food imports as much as possible what intend do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
...pments of new medicines. In this essay. i will examine both sides of the argument...
^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pments of new medicines. In this essay. i will examine both sides of the argument...
^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... of the argument before concluding that i am inclined to support the later opinio...
^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Animals
...es. Foremost among these is its organs. animals are very close to humans when it comes ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37209302326 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79229605389 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8049057169 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.2 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384726100384 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109769957069 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117195379577 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233310365946 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691890082523 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.