Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th

Essay topics:

Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

many believe that using animals to testify medicine and product safety is allowed as it is advantageous to humankind. while some agree with this notion in terms of product quality improvement, I disagree as it is illegal and against animal rights, resulting in ecosystem imbalance.

The merits of involving animals to experiment the medicine and product safety are improving the product quality while being developed. As this brings advantages to humanity, mistakes can be spotted before being consumed by humans, reducing the risk of human error. For instance, a study conducted by Harvard in 2017 suggested that the decrease in paracetamol's deadly side effects case by 20% was the result of using animals as the tester. The errors were pointed out, reducing the risk of side effects to happen in humans. However, utilizing animals to do products and medicine trial-error is abusive and it is morally wrong.

Developing products safety and medicine using animals should be prohibited due to morally unacceptable, potentially resulting in an ecosystem imbalance. Simply put, if companies depend on animals to develop their products, the number of certain animals will be decreased and put at risk to the environment. For instance, research done by WWF in 2019 stated that there was a 30% decrease in the black mouse in Idaho which affected the behavior of snakes living in Forrest to step out and invaded public spaces due to food deprivation. Thus, using animals in products and medicine production should not be authorized.

To conclude, although many accept using animals in drug production and product safety, I believe it should be restricted as morally wrong, causing ecosystem imbalance. Hence, strict regulation of this act is required.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-21 ci6u0w 67 view
2024-01-21 ci6u0w 89 view
2023-08-06 thlinh 61 view
2023-07-22 ThHuong 61 view
2022-12-10 congnguyen05x204 67 view
Essays by user aikzat :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
many believe that using animals to testify m...
^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...wed as it is advantageous to humankind. while some agree with this notion in terms of...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3082437276 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79363493335 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2004084393 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334623052616 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136242290779 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105921877347 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212251822959 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194006862983 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.