Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that reading books drive more imagination and language competencies than watching tv. I agree as reading books could activate more parts in the brain and enrich someone's vocabulary to speak the better language.
Reading books has proven to stimulate more neurotransmitters in the brain compared to watching Tv. This is because reading books requires people to imagine the unseen things which activate more than one part of the brain, resulting in a wider connection in the brain that creates imagination compared to those who watch tv. According to a study conducted by NCBI in 2018, reading books stimulate 3 brain parts in children which are hippocampus 1, hippocampus 2, and prefrontal cortex, while those who watched tv only stimulate hippocampus 1. Those who read books can share more intriguing stories afterward compared to those who watched tv.
Furthermore, reading also drives better language skills since people will be exposed to many words in order to understand an event. As the vocabulary increases, people can find a more suitable word for different situations they face in everyday life compared to those who only watch tv. A survey done by the University of Indonesia in 2006 found that respondents who spent their time reading books in English on weekends were likely to speak English faster than those who spent their weekend times watching tv.
To conclude, reading books are more likely to help people in developing their imagination and language skills compared to watching tv. Thus, the habit of reading books is better to be cultivated in people from an early age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | aikzat | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-29 | codeRunner | 82 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | woshixiefeiji | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-06 | Isha Mehra | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | J a Hermione | 92 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 67
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep what problem can lack sleep cause what is the solution 67
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16349809886 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68767237938 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501901140684 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7768586281 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491045330878 0.244688304435 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233724151394 0.084324248473 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11136295645 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331424826955 0.151304729494 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179496868573 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.