Nowadays, animal habitats are increasingly under threat from mining projects. Some believe that stopping these projects to protect species is more important than proceeding , whilst others disagree . Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
The question of whether or not to support mining projects has provoked controversy among public. While it appears logical for saying that mining projects should be prohibited as they can pose threats to the wildlife habitat, many people advocate the continuation of these projects for many reasons. Both argument will be analyzed before I present my own opinion.
On one hand, in support of mining projects, advocates maintain
that mining activities can pave the way for economic growth in many disadvantaged regions by offering job opportunities to local people and generating more income. For instance, Australia has recently witnessed a mining boom which provides work to thousands of people and exert a positive impact on regional economy. Although some people argue that mining is considered double-edge sword, its merits are worth considering.
On the other hand, mining projects are often associated with environmental concerns. Overexploitation can trigger devastation which directly results in the loss of wildlife habitat. What it comes down to is that native species will no longer have home to survive which poses a threat to endangered ones. To illustrate this point, Brazil is a perfect example for the overexploitation of mine that leads to the irreparable damage to environment and causes thousands of species to be on the brink of danger. Although many contend that the influence is insignificant and the reduction in the number of some species reflects the so-called biological balance, this appears illogical since those animals are important parts of the ecosystem. Thus, it can be seen why environmentalists insist in stopping mining projects.
Taking everything into consideration, I am inclined to believe
that mine exploitation should be discontinued due to its detrimental impact on the environment. Nonetheless, in coming years, when people figure out mining methods that are friendlier to the natural environment, mining projects could be advocated for their upsides to the economic aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-12 | nguyenthikimsang | 84 | view |
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Education should be accessible to people from all economic backgrounds All levels of education from primary school to tertiary education should be free To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Technological innovations in this 21st century have caused more harm than good Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether or not to support mining projects has p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0923491514 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2860768661 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220447708405 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743076411159 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383831056902 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990701376804 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645032474387 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.