Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development
In contemporary society, it is noticeable that there is an income disparity between well-known people in the entertainment business and those who work for legislative service. This gap can be explained by their distinctive sources of income, and in my opinion, it results in disadvantages for society’s development.
To commence with, the income difference comes from the fact that celebrities can derive income from diversified sources while politicians’s salary depends on the quite tight state budget. Indeed, celebrities make money not only from their primary professions but also from lucrative endorsement deals with corporate giants. To illustrate, apart from film casting compensation, internationally popular actors or actresses amass substantial wealth through ambassador agreements with major fashion brands like Channel, and Louis Vuitton. By contrast, people working in national organizations rely on fixed salaries and are constrained by their roles in the political arena, which seldom intersect with the commercial world. Politicians are generally banned from cultivating commercial connections with corporations to avoid the abuse of power leading to their limited income packages.
From my perspective, the pay gap between celebrities and politicians brings advantages to social mobility. In terms of the economy, while receiving various sources of income, well-known people in the entertainment industry contribute more greatly than officials to the GDP index of each nation. To be more specific, their reputation enhances the brand awareness of the corporations that they represent and even creates a consumption trend that results in a great sales increase. Moreover, from the social aspect, many wealthy celebrities use some of their earnings for charities and take part in social campaigns where their speeches can help to appeal the public awareness, creating a better society. For instance, Emma Watson actress working as a UN Women's Goodwill Ambassador, has inspired millions of women around the world with her impressive speeches about gender equality, and also has made an enormous contribution of both money and effort to the UN organization fighting for women's rights.
In conclusion, the fact that celebrities use multiple channels to increase their wealth while politicians heavily rely on their state-sponsored salary causes a wealth gap between them. However, I evaluate this trend as positive because of the worth-mentioning contribution of celebrities to economic development and social welfare.
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88918918919 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30250032556 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8751126518 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.642857143 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169516220504 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576355465692 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398485095781 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103815242085 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402247139815 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.