Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Undoubtedly, celebrities are famous amongst the masses. As a result, public figures like singers and actors earn considerably higher salaries than politicians. This is because politics is not exactly a means of earning money. Rather, it is an opportunity to serve people. Hence, it is normal for politicians to earn less than entertainers who are professionals who generate a lot of money. In my opinion, this is a positive development.
Politicians cannot earn much because politics is not a profession. It is your way of serving the society by occupying democratically elected positions. Elected politicians are paid a decent salary and their duty is to use public funds appropriately for the welfare of the nation. It is not possible to pay them as much as celebrities because they do not generate revenue. Also, a politician represents people, so they cannot be ridiculously rich. In a country like India, there are lots of poor people. Their MP or MLA cannot be ridiculously rich. In addition, politicians are paid by the government and the government can only pay them what other government officials are also paid.
Celebrities, on the other hand, earn more because of their popularity. They can earn huge amounts of money by endorsing products. Successful actors or singers also generate a lot of money through the sale of tickets of their movies, concerts or albums. That is why they are paid more. A person’s salary will always be commensurate with the revenue you generate.
To conclude, politicians do not earn as much as entertainers because politics is not a money-making profession. Rather it is an opportunity to dedicate one’s life for the nation. Politicians who get elected to law making bodies do earn decent salaries, but they cannot earn as much as entertainers because their job is to make laws for the nation and they do not generate much revenue. In my opinion, this is not a bad development.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that learning art subjects is unnecessary as we should focus on more practical subjects like technology or science Others believe that these subjects are crucial in society because they impact on many aspects of life Discuss both views a 89
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households owning four types of electronic devices between 1995 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...iticians to earn less than entertainers who are professionals who generate a lot of mon...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...itics is not a money-making profession. Rather it is an opportunity to dedicate one’s ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.034375 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06746886445 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2736509601 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0434782609 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9130434783 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65217391304 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258327151466 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733814743458 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561628374595 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169053953669 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739538941538 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...iticians to earn less than entertainers who are professionals who generate a lot of mon...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...itics is not a money-making profession. Rather it is an opportunity to dedicate one’s ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.034375 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06746886445 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2736509601 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0434782609 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9130434783 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65217391304 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258327151466 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733814743458 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561628374595 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169053953669 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739538941538 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.