Nowadays computers are widely used in education. As a result, some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
By growing use of computers in schools, there is an opinion saying that teachers lose their previous importance. However, I completely disagree with the given statement because of irreplaceable role of teachers in some courses and vital mission of them in students’ personal development.
To begin with, despite many useful applications of computers in schools, there would be some restrictions to entire replace of teachers by them. That is, if teachers’ duty in some classes be assigned to computers completely, the result will be lose of education quality. A good illustration of that is highlighted in physical education. Students could not learn how to exercise correctly only by following of a group of recorded commands. Therefore, presence of an experienced trainer would always be necessary. He/she not only help trainees to modify their movements but also identify their talent in a specific sport which is beyond the ability of an electronic device.
In addition, another argument is the teacher’s crucial work related to formation of children’s personality which is not diminished even in this digital era. To put it differently, some adults’ behaviour in life are originated from the communicating manners that they were instructed directly in school time. Take the philanthropy as a human value for example; professors always try to intensify it among the students by exhibiting some altruistic encounters about the emotional and physical state of their pupils. As a result, if these educators would not exist, children may grow up without such ethics.
In conclusion, while widespread use of computers in modern education, I believe that teachers still keep a central major because of necessity to their physical present in some programs and their important mission to school such ethical life lessons to student.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42361111111 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02392083597 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6704615016 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.153846154 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171971545196 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056943828714 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529917434229 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10966332305 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302783548304 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.