Nowadays, it is more convenient and easier for people to travel to other countries. Is this a positive or negative development?
In contemporary society, the increasing number of people chose foreign countries as their travel destinations. To the best of my knowledge, this point of view is reasonable for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that this phenomenon contributes significantly to promote culture exchange. Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, engaging in other cultures is a strategic approach to learn about cultural differences. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that the increased convenience of international travel is proportional to the growth of exploring cultural diversity. For example, in the past the Arabians used to consider westerners as their foes because of different religious beliefs. However, thanks to higher interaction in various social aspects including tourism, now they have good relations in many fields. This example is the illustration of the fact that the rapid growth of international travel has chronic positive effects on different cultural backgrounds.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by opponents to this is that traveling foreign countries has negative impacts on environment, because airplanes are huge producers of carbon-dioxide and many unconscious tourists intentionally do harm to nature. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that by replacing old engines with cleaner and more modern ones, people can reduce the environmental influence of the flight. Moreover, governments can minimize the destructive effects on local habitats by strict punishments. For instance, according to the survey conducted by BBC News, Singapore, where international travel is one of the top tourism platforms, has severe punishments for citizens and tourists to protect the environment.
In conclusion, the convenience of traveling abroad is generally a positive trend as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-02 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | arsh wahid | view | |
| 2022-10-02 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | arsh wahid | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 70
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001 89
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71134020619 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27487262119 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9671380851 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268259734725 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760321081455 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497101236623 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15746279673 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231341873332 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.