Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many parts of the world, music plays a significant role in cultural differences. Many hold a belief that music deserves to be called as a universal language no matter in the past or future. To the best of my knowledge, this point of view is grounded for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that music and languages are closely intertwined in one way or another. Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, music has an irreplaceable function of expressing thoughts and feelings, which is the main characteristic of language. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that music can express emotions that cannot describe by words. For example, higher pitch, fluctuations in melody and faster tempo can transmit happiness, while slow rhythm conveys sadness. This example is the illustration of the fact that music can touch the diverse emotions of listeners.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that music is not a universal language, because in different countries, people prefer various types of music. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that in the past each country has its own style of music that depends on their cultures; nevertheless, due to cutural globalization, people are inclined to enjoy similar kinds of music from dominant cultures. For instance, according to the survey conducted by BBC News, English has become an international language that is accompanied by the growing interests in US-UK music.
In conclusion, music is a universal language that connects people all around the world towards emotions and cultures as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-22 | Nguyên-MTTN | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | Nguyên-MTTN | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | Nguyên-MTTN | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | quang193 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | nphthao296 | 56 | view |
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015 78
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 73
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...gnificant role in cultural differences. Many hold a belief that music deserves to be call...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17204301075 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97038996713 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5704626691 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218353295788 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755817075168 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488015893064 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131222836029 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192617398499 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.