Nowadays, many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
Nowadays, many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
Yes, technology has changed the people’s interaction by many ways.
In the past, it was very difficult to people who want to connect with each others. They communicate by letters or face to face. The drawback with past communication ways were very slow and disadvantages. But when people face to face, they will feel more funny and friendly.
Since technology has developed, communication between people became easier, faster and more convinient. Moreover, relationship of people can be improved when the quality of technology developed. When people adapted to how to uses technology, they will become modern and intergrate with social. There are many modern equipment such as smart phone, computes, calling services… which help people collect the information from over the world or chat with their friends.
However, technology has own disadvantages. The security wasn’t ensure, people’s information can be revealed or people can be defrauded by crimes…
Overall, technology bring many advantages to humans. It’s a positive development and make it easy for people to communicate.
- Nowadays many people interact with each other has changed because of technology 56
- the chart below will show you the information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 56
- job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing 56
- natural talent or training 56
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much modern equipment', 'a good deal of modern equipment'.
Suggestion: much modern equipment; a good deal of modern equipment
...n and intergrate with social. There are many modern equipment such as smart phone, computes, calling ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke it easy for people to communicate.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 179.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65363128492 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99388180056 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63687150838 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5010847969 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8461538462 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7692307692 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434754696108 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162303394845 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17723843821 0.0667982634062 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280853410786 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205087582128 0.056905535591 360% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.