Nowadays most of people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree
In present, majority of individuals make a great effort in order to learn academic knowledge at university, while others believe that to learn vocational skills are more beneficial. Personally, i agree that studying at university possess tones of advantages comparing other ways of studying.
To begin with, some people participate in vocational training courses because of several reasons. First of all, in terms of studying vocational training is enable to students to concentrate on only professional aspects of their possession. Thus, they should not obligatory to learn other subjects, which are not related to their interests. For example, it is definitely necessary for electrician to assemble electric circuit rather than to study philosophy at university. Furthermore, attendance of only vocational training courses avoid waste of time and money. Therefore, students are burdened overloaded university issues and do not focus on their profession lessons completely, while they pay to university tuition fee in a great extent. However, they are able to support their family budgets by taking training courses and create their business at less time.
Secondly, I believe that studying at university give to pupils not only specialized skills but also other skills ,which will be essential for them in their career life. It allows them in order to provide demands of companies. For instance, communication skills assist them in order to get in company with their counterparts.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, in my point of view, students should get advantages of university studying, although training course also would be effective for them.
- some people believe that computers and the internet carry more weight than traditional education in children's study. Some others believe that traditional schooling and teachers are still essential and more effective. Discuss both viewpoints and give 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 61
- In recent years, many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is the case? What can be done to attract local people 67
- Nowadays most of people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries today, both men and women need work full time. Therefore, some proper think men and women should share household tasks equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...skills are more beneficial. Personally, i agree that studying at university posse...
^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...erms of studying vocational training is enable to students to concentrate on only prof...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...specialized skills but also other skills ,which will be essential for them in thei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50387596899 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9441856383 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8739137041 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.230769231 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206906573369 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746464598118 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075931303997 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135028991962 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097211898458 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.