Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. Why? Effects on society?
Nowadays, it is observed that the attendance of science majors in tertiary schools is inadequate. There are a host of factors attributed to be the causes of this phenomenon and this trend might have some ominous impacts on society.
On the one hand, a vast array of causes has contributed to the prevalence of this tendency. The first reason stems from the knowledge that individuals find difficult to obtain . For example, when studying quantum mechanics or chemistry in universities, pupils usually confront with the obstacles in gaining a deeper insight into the principles of particles and equations. These contents might discourage the spirit of learning and motivate students to abolish these courses. The second reason is that it seems to be very hard for a person studying scientific majors to be recruited for a high-paid occupation since the information of these subjects is impractical when it comes to appliance. Therefore, many corporations or employers prefer to employ those studying courses which are the demands of society like information technology or marketing rather than those attending scientific disciplines.
On the other hand, this trend is fraught with pitfalls due to the detrimental bearings on society it may bring. Firstly, if tertiary students are prone not to choose scientific curriculums, there will be a lack of breakthroughs and inventions in science. To illustrate, but for the judicious decision to study physics of Tesla, there would not be the existence of alternating current, which humans leverage every day. Thus, in years to come, the development of the modern civilisation will slacken. Moreover, this trend could trigger the shortages of scientific professors and teachers in universities. As a result, subjects relating to science will vanish from education systems in the near future if humans do not have any proper approaches in order to tackle the issue.
In conclusion, admittedly, there are plenty of reasons considered to be the incentives for students to refuse to pursue scientific disciplines. This trend may be unfavorable to society unless authorities and experts propose feasible measures.
- The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds cooking cleaning pet caring and repairing the house The second chart show the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day Summarize the information 78
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summariez the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features 73
- Some people say that school children should be mainly taught about the literature e g fiction and poetry of their own country because it is more important than that of other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below show that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...iary schools is inadequate. There are a host of factors attributed to be the causes ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hat individuals find difficult to obtain . For example, when studying quantum mech...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40059347181 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02523726377 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3193086279 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987006981177 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295022522227 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290133026995 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578167057899 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191905974402 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...iary schools is inadequate. There are a host of factors attributed to be the causes ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hat individuals find difficult to obtain . For example, when studying quantum mech...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40059347181 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02523726377 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3193086279 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987006981177 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295022522227 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290133026995 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578167057899 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191905974402 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.