Some experts believe that when a country is already rich, any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens any more satisfied. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether any economic progression and prosperity would not bring satisfaction to inhabitants when a country has become affluent. Although a school of thoughts holds that the residents of a prosperous nation no longer prioritise economy and wealth, I would advocate that these factors might make them content to some extent.
On the one hand, a vast array of reasons has prevailed some individuals on acknowledging the former opinion. Firstly, since a country is rich, wealth and economic development are no longer the concerns of a large number of inhabitants. This can be perfectly exemplified that Japanese magnates tend to retire at the young age in order to spare time for theirselves and families. Hence, in lieu of devoting too much focus on finance, wealth individuals are prone to put some aspects of their lives like health or relaxation on the top of their priorities to be happy. Furthermore, a thriving economy requires corporations and companies to work more. It may lead to the fact that local citizens have to deal with a great amount of workload and have more shifts, which might make them feel unsatisfactory.
On the other hand, there are a host of justifications convincing me to concede that economic thrive and prosperity could beneficial to the residents of an affluent nation. The first factor is that prosperity facilitates the improvements of the living standards in some rich countries. For instance, thanks to the wealthy economy, the inhabitants of the UK can get access to plenty social previledges like healthcare or education, which creates opportunities for them to have a good life. Moreover, the development of economy and wealth are capable of bringing a great amount of money for a nation to deal with its issues. To illustrate, but for a prosperous economy, the USA could not have enough money to allocate for making investments to some fundamental fields such as national security or education. Accordingly, this country could not have become strongest and most influencial like today.
In conclusion, apparently, it cannot be denied that a thriving economies cannot make citizens feel happy; nevertheless, I want to affirm that people can reap a lot of benefits of these factors.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether any economic progression and prosperity...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...velopment are no longer the concerns of a large number of inhabitants. This can be perfectly exem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...actory. On the other hand, there are a host of justifications convincing me to conc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'economy'?
Suggestion: economy
...ly, it cannot be denied that a thriving economies cannot make citizens feel happy; nevert...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14986376022 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01742545439 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561307901907 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2155291297 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161013686923 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522620550708 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383410100691 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966328813188 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450044589698 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether any economic progression and prosperity...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...velopment are no longer the concerns of a large number of inhabitants. This can be perfectly exem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...actory. On the other hand, there are a host of justifications convincing me to conc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'economy'?
Suggestion: economy
...ly, it cannot be denied that a thriving economies cannot make citizens feel happy; nevert...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14986376022 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01742545439 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561307901907 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2155291297 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161013686923 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522620550708 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383410100691 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966328813188 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450044589698 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.