Nowadays, people always throw the old things away when they buy new things, and we are living in a throw-away society. What factors cause this phenomenon? What problem does the phenomenon leads to?
With the advancement of technology and advertising, shopping today become much easier in comparison to the past. Consequently, it leads to a throw-way habit where people buy new things to replace the old one just because it is outdated. This essay will discuss some reasons and problems that are caused by this habit.
This phenomenon is caused by various factors. First, people nowadays pay more attention to their appearance than in the past. Thus, to fulfil this need, they prefer buying new clothes or accessories rather than wearing the old one. In some special occasion like meeting or attending an interview, it is understandable that a new dress would boost the owner’s comfort and confidence, which is a significant contribution to their success. Secondly, due to the industrial revolution, mass production becomes popular which helps boost the competitiveness amongst companies, thus to attract customers, they often launch a novel product annually. As a result, more and more people, especially juvenile buy new stuff to catch this trend rather than fulfil their actual need. Take mobile phone trend for an example, each year, there a season when people line up a long queue in front of an Apple store to own their latest product.
This habit causes several serve problems. First, some people become accustomed to a habit that forces themselves to buy new stuff regardless of their actual demand and finally leads themselves to become a shopaholic. This kind of habit not only waste their time but also make them overwhelming with debt. While adults have to deal with financial stress, a child become lazy and get accustomed to a sedentary lifestyle, which will affect negatively both their mental and physical development. From the environmental point of view, using new stuff means the old things must be thrown away, which means more waste products, especially the non-recyclable one are exerted to the environment, which eventually leads the entire world to an uninhabitable place.
In conclusion, throw-away habit affects negatively both an individual and the environment. Thus, before buying a product, people should make the right decision based on their actual needs rather than just try to catch the latest trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81560904974 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0514408322 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203403644508 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722738733398 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061016520846 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131985279325 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360643998131 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.