Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport. Why is that? What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more?
It is become increasingly common that bicycles are less deployed to transport. New ways of transit and the shift in the workplace can be attributable to the phenomenon. Government interference should be welcomed to motivate the utilization of the vehicle.
The creations of the state-of-the-art vehicles such as cars, motorbikes, and public ones may act as a precursor to the change of people's altitude towards bicycles. The new modes of transport are quicker, more convenient, and more comfortable compared to their conventional counterpart. It is plain that commuting to work by bicycles emerges as physically demanding, let alone those who are disabled. Another issue faced by potential bicyclists is that the current working environment has exerted greater pressure on employees. This means that people are pressed by heavier workloads and extended working hours, thus they have to optimized their time for commuting to do their places of work. The hectic schedule thus prevents individuals opting for bicycles to travel from home to work and vice versa.
To support the usage of bicycles, the intervention of goverments is highly welcomed. The first measure is that the authorities can launch social programs to raise the awareness of the public about the merits of riding bycicles. Likewise, governmental organizations can make use of mass media to educate their citizen about the lessen impacts on the environment when people use bicycles. The deterioration of the environment is a topic of interest among the public in recent years. By acknowledging people's meaningful contribution to ameliorate the impacts of pollution, the method would be far more effective as it addresses the popular challenge concerned by many. Financial rewards for bicycle users as well as subsidies for bicycle manufacture can also be introduced to attract more people to use the vehicles.
In sum, the advent of modern vehicles and working environment burden are the main driving forces behind the movement of individuals from bicycles to other means of transport. It is thought that the role of governmental bodies is of primary importance to encourage people to harness bicycles more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | luongduc1504 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | Ivan Matthew Norwood | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | Ivan Matthew Norwood | 89 | view |
- More and more people these days work harder and longer hours and have no time for family life and friends What are the causes in your opinion for this How is it affecting family life and society as a whole 84
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 84
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et alone those who are disabled. Another issue faced by potential bicyclists is t...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ss media to educate their citizen about the lessen impacts on the environment when people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05551638241 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56432748538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2812280183 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325161057052 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873383431775 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857850048736 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179722043803 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580982538939 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.