Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
In today’s world, it is widely perceived that a great amount of food bought from shops and restaurants is being thrown away irresponsibly. This phenomenon could be attributed to a number of contributory factors, but several approaches could be adopted to tackle it.
There are numerous reasons why foodstuffs are being tossed into the garbage, one of which is the promotion campaigns by retailers. More specifically, with the aim of alleviating the food inventory issue such as perishable produce or foods that have short shelf lives, promotion campaigns such as “buy one get one free” or “two for the price of one” have been implemented to lure customers. At the same time, consumers with the mentality of desiring inexpensive possessions are likely to be trapped, which would therefore lead to impulse purchase. Another justification is overstocking. To be more specific, should buyers not make a detailed plan of what they are going to buy before shopping, their shopping carts might be full of unusable food products.
In order to combat the above - mentioned problems, the authorities should place emphasis on the following elements. First and foremost, consumers should raise their awareness before buying in a bulk. This could be done by imposing a heavy fine on both buyers who squander and jettison food products. Another feasible measure would be for the state to compose a shopping list and stick to it. In other words, consumers have the opportunity to decide wisely what foodstuffs should be bought, which would in turn prevent a plethora of food from ending up as waste.
In sum, various actions can be taken to resolve the problems that are certain to arise as food bought from the retail shops ends up in the landfill sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09342560554 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76666069748 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6623721815 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259451275532 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876886892232 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083224171287 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169819680446 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261300403929 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.