Nowadays some employers think that formal qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
In today's society, some recruiters favour candidates who have formal educational qualifications over those with only personal past experience or good characteristics. This essay will outline some causes of this tendency, and I personally believe that there are both positive and negative effects.
There are a number of reasons why some employers think that academic degrees are more important than life experience or personal traits. Academic degrees are considered a tool to measure the level of knowledge that students are capable of. To be more specific, to achieve a good degree in most universities, students need to pass many examinations focusing on their knowledge and participate in practical training courses. These factors ensure that students be equipped with in-depth knowledge and useful skills in the field that the company is looking for. As a result, these people could make greater contributions to their company than those without any academic qualifications. In addition, in terms of people having life experience or personal qualities often lack knowledge in their field, and therefore, companies would waste resources and time to training these people.
In my opinion, this trend brings both positive and detrimental impacts. The positive effects would include the highly skilled employees who can complete excellently company's tasks. This ensures the quality of the business, which, as a result, can secure and build the company's reputation. Another benefit is saving time on training and resources. An employee with proper skills can start working immediately with a minimal amount of instruction. However, it is wrong to disregard one's life experience or personal characteristics. For example, negative personalities such as dishonesty in the workplace could pose a serious threat to the development of any companies.
In conclusion, employers prefer people with better qualifications rather than those who only have life experience or good qualities because qualifications are proof to prove that their holders are sufficiently trained at university. Nevertheless, I think that ignoring life experience or good personalities is a great shortcoming in recruitment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development 82
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three di erent sources between 1990 and 2005 89
- Average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person, 1967-2007 73
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...fications over those with only personal past experience or good characteristics. This essay wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tion. However, it is wrong to disregard ones life experience or personal characteris...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12705543055 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9528687492 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328007406748 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963484233058 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084595159221 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190780725614 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018288309543 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.