Some critics think that community museums and art exhibitions will not necessary since people can observe antiques and pieces of art through the internet. From my perspective, I am against this view.
It is understandable why people suppose that they can see ancient objects and pieces of art through the screen. The key rationale is that everything included the antiques and artworks which are frequently updated on the internet and free, so they think they can enjoy the beauty of those valuable things by using smart devices. However, this idea may negatively affect the way people appreciate these precious objects. This is because people can be grabbed by other attractive things on the internet, and they may just take a short look at the objects, then they will switch to see things that are more interesting such as funny memes or hilarious videos.
Another disadvantage of seeing historical objects and pieces of art through the internet is people can enjoy profoundly the works. Individuals cannot observe all aspects of the masterpieces and antiques so they are not capable of witnessing each detail on the works and they cannot stay focused on enjoying the beauty of these valuable objects. Moreover, a community museum and art galleries are places that conserve not only the value of own country but also the soul of amazing artists.
In conclusion, I support the idea that public museums and art exhibitions are necessary.
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years 56
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits Why How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08438818565 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65084367198 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7313987782 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271183940348 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110947253506 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797696478743 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163143501176 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254068616382 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.