Nowadays there is a growing amount of advertising aimed at children. Some people think this has negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern day, the amount of advertising which targets children is increasing. Many people believe that it has a negative influence on children and should be forbidden. In my opinion, I disagree that advertisements have negative impacts on children, meanwhile it should not be banned due to economical issues. In this essay, I will demonstrate the statements and give some examinations.
There are two main reasons why the advertisements are harmless to children. First of all, the government would control the content and have strict policies for protecting children. This is because there are lots of international policies that prevent children from being harmed, therefore public media platforms such as TV, newspapers, and Youtube have to follow. Secondly, parents could restrict their children to limited types of content. For example, when registering Internet data they could apply a safe access pack for children at home. Hence, children would be highly secure due to parents' awareness. As a consequence, children’s rights have a powerful authority over the globe.
Moreover, there are two major reasons why advertisements should not be banned. Firstly, companies would see a downward trend in the economy. This is due to the fact that their products could not expand widely to the public due to the banned sections related to advertisements. For instance if a company received a forbidden advertisement order, it could never grow. In addition, companies would face disadvantages in market competition. Therefore, firms without advertisement channels would leave behind other competitors. As a result it would lead to the decrease in market competitiveness and lead to monopoly in some fields.
In conclusion, I believe that advertisements are harmless to children in some aspects, including government regulation in protecting children and limiting the content approach to them by parents. Therefore, advertisements should not be banned because companies would lose their position in the market and leave behind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
- Today food travels thousands of miles from the farm to the consumers Why does this happen Is it a positive or a negative trend 78
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country between 1979 and 2004 84
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- the world s population has been increasing significantly and people are running out of water food and fuel What consequences may overpopulation lead to What measures can be taken to fight overpopulation 84
- the graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...eanwhile it should not be banned due to economical issues. In this essay, I will demonstra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53205128205 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14499356909 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2782303868 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325162868515 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993996463812 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705012232674 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221066281008 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101514235234 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.