As technology upgrades and improves daily, it is now easier for all the readers to be up-to-date. Recently, social media prefer the tragedies news to the good aspects of life. Therefore, it is said to be hurtful to some individuals in specific and to the community in general. This essay will discuss the reason why the journalists almost always report horrible news and the consequences it will make.
First of all, according to a recent survey, the viewers and readers mostly tend to consume the dreadful and awful news rather than the opposite, so that has become a motivation for the reporters. People always want to have a consciousness about what will come to them such as drought, flood or tornado to prepare. Another thing is that good news is mainly for some group or people mentioned, not for the whole society. For instance, a TV channel announce that a village has been affected by a new virus, and that information provided aims to warn people about that infectious disease. In short, reporting emergencies and troubles is totally acceptable.
However, there are some articles about scandals of some celebrities which attract many readers. Those articles usually make things worse than it means to be which drag numerous celebrities down in their career. Therefore, it will become an invisible weapon dealing a severe damage to their mental issues. Some have tried to suicide and succeeded which is extremely noticeable. Even after the critics the articles made, people still gossip behind their back which will lead them back to the critical time again.
In conclusion, everything has its two sides not except the critical news, they help us with awareness of the bad incoming
things to get ready but they sometimes deal a critical damage to some individuals.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 56
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 89
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tragedies'' or 'tragedy's'?
Suggestion: tragedies'; tragedy's
...date. Recently, social media prefer the tragedies news to the good aspects of life. There...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'severe damage'.
Suggestion: severe damage
...will become an invisible weapon dealing a severe damage to their mental issues. Some have tried...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp us with awareness of the bad incoming things to get ready but they sometimes d...
^^^
Line 8, column 45, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'critical damage'.
Suggestion: critical damage
...gs to get ready but they sometimes deal a critical damage to some individuals.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, another thing, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in short, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03040540541 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63353858426 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6254435873 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124797319751 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419148550539 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286320988448 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553849313851 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407553913151 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.