Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology Has this been a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. Has this been a positive or negative development?

Technology is one of the areas that is developed, improved every day, every hour, and is also what changes people's lives dramatically. Nowadays, the ways people communicate are also very different from the old day thanks to the presence of modern technologies. This brings a lot of benefits but has some drawbacks.
One of the most tremendous assistance that technologies provide us today is its extremely fast connection speed and extensive network connectivity. Indeed, the Internet is present in almost every country all over the world so the connections are not geographically limited. The advancement of science has made the speed of transmission of information is nearly instantaneous. We can stay in Vietnam and email our friends or colleagues overseas or even know what they are doing through video calls. Communication and connectivity are incredibly easy compared to forms where technology is not yet developed, like hand mail shipped by water, which sometimes takes months to be delivered.
The use of technology also requires reasonable methods due to its harmful side of limiting interpersonal skills. Indeed, according to a study taken by the University of Greenwich, the exposure of adolescents to technology too early and for a long time will cause negative effects on the ability to communicate directly between people and gain the risk of autism. Young people are encouraged to interact more openly to boost flexibility, confidence, connectivity as well as develop other soft skills.
In conclusion, everything has two good and bad sides and so does technology. If we know how to make the most use of it, it will deliver great effects not only in the field of communication. On the other hand, improper use will make us depend too much on it and sometimes lose our mastery.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-22 oginus 56 view
2020-10-21 Huy Do 56 view
2020-10-21 Huy Do 84 view
Essays by user Huy Do :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eld of communication. On the other hand, improper use will make us depend too muc...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15410958904 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07459299224 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63698630137 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.454619666 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147193528798 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422212457056 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438122665373 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831516518647 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596962116967 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.