Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
With the help of technology development, more and more people gain simple ways when they send a message in long-distance friendships. Therefore, international networking can be gained as the positive improvement.
The way human communicate has been changed by technology, and this can connect people for long distance companion. This is because, a sophisticated technology in 3G cell phones provides audio-visual platform and high-quality networking, creating more real feeling in communicate. For example, before phones were invented people using paper mail by hand writing to exchange information for long distance without any sound, but the telephone networking was developed so that people can hear people’s voice from different place and see face-to-face, and now there are more than 3,2 billion people using phones. Therefore, if more people using cell phone, they communicate in large networking.
Technology can create an international networking, making them interacting with people in cross countries. That is to say, the communication technology has a variety of features, encouraging people to share personal experiences in platform online. Hence, even though adults frequently get a new friendship by virtual devices, they will gain bias information. Facebook has a "groups" features, being easy making a studying English groups through this web and sharing social activity with people in global scale, while people are more susceptible to accept hoax information by "news feed" feature, and almost 10% of teenagers are recorded being influence due to unreliable news.
To conclude, sending message to people in other countries can be utilized due to sophisticated technology in the present. Hence, the positive alteration can create communities globally. Where possible, people can gain benefits by connecting people internationally.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- more and more students eat junk food what is the cause and the problem 67
- Making the beer showed in the diagram
- Causes of mortality in young people 78
- What is the role of the government in health care discuss both of view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ill gain bias information. Facebook has a 'groups' features, being easy...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88686131387 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36411828136 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.096502797 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27925898898 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110001117818 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633738047911 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174397005196 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00779079781365 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.