Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make ?
Has this become a positive or negative development ?

In the contemporary era, it has been argued that advanced technology brings about plenty of impacts on the way people communicate with others as well as the types of relationships people make. From my perspective, I consider this outlook to have both positive adverse sides.
It is irrefutable that advanced technology has revolutionized people’s ways of interacting with one another. Telecommunication is now being used as an official way for people around the world to get in touch with others. This facilitates connection among people. Throughout the internet, officers can contact with foreign customers or investors immediately; thus, they don’t have to waste money traveling overseas to go on business. Moreover, studying at home is not a difficulty anymore. Digital applications like Zalo and Messenger enable students to work and discuss at the same time despite the distance. It is completely possible to assert that technology renders communication methods much more simple than in the past.
Despite its propitious influences, it is worth contemplating that there are some downsides of this new tool of communication. Chatting on social media applications not expresses senders’ attitude and emotion. Consequently, a number of disputes among individuals derive from these misunderstandings. Furthermore, giving prominence to social media, people don’t have many chances to meet and to talk directly with others. As a result, relationships are being deteriorated which prompts people to be less approachable.
Although applying technology to daily communication may leave a few adverse impacts, it still has some undeniable advantages which contribute to improving the ways of communication. I personally opine that the benefit overweigh its harms

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view
Essays by user qhuy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, as to, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68301886792 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37026978225 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5414779216 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30784280363 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803774110083 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102438137913 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176568458272 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957052150656 0.056905535591 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.