Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has been a positive or negative development.
Over the last two decades, the phenomenon of technology and its corresponding impacts on people’s interactions have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas most of the entrepreneurs and generation Z keep up with the communication alteration, others who are mostly the parents of Gen Z, so-called Gen X striving to keep up with their obsolete communication style. In my mind, the evolution of communication via technology has many benefits in the realm of both business and private life, which outweigh its demerits.
At the mercy of technological advancement especially in the field of ICT people have continuous access to a myriad of social media platforms, web services, applications, and the like. Moreover, due to the Covid-19 permeation world experienced tough communication constraints, which imposed a great deal of novel communication engagement via the internet. As a result, e-commerce, augmented reality and virtual reality are becoming the three main aspects that empowered people’s communication skills and financial achievement in the modern world. To give an example, sports exercises, professional meetings, school classes have been held online for the past 1.5 years. In addition, from a private life perspective families maintain their close-knit and catchup through applications such as Whatsapp, Skype video calls. Moreover, geeks have a great leapfrog as they take the edge off communication limitation by privileging virtual reality and augmented reality in their social life and entertainment
However, there are other people, especially the senior crust who are on edge, since they are less flexible to accept the cutting edge of communication. They opine, losing eye contact, having fewer hugs and kisses will change our world to a kind of robotic world, in which humankind will be surrounded by savvier gadgets and less love.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments of both sides, as a tech-savvy woman I opt to support the idea of tech-communication as its drawback cannot eclipse its advantages. However, it is our responsibility as the young generation to back up our extended family and the older generation in which involving more in their obsolete communication style and making them more familiar with the state-of-the-art of communication style.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s on people’s interactions have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas most o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 999, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in their social life and entertainment However, there are other people, especia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53107344633 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29803681387 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612994350282 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9595588101 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.166666667 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105487255678 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402202669183 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401820105346 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607326717262 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446858771109 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.