Recently, the phenomenon of the ancient festivals and their corresponding impacts has sparked a long-running dispute among old-fashion and sophisticated people. In this regard, whereas some believe both ancient traditional and religious festivals have to be held based on their ancient cultures, others of the vantage point that the aim of taking part and holding these ceremonies play the most significant role, as human conduct and taste can alter over the years and decades. In my mind, culture alteration is inevitable due to the following compelling reasons.
It goes without saying that, dogmatic and narrow-minded characteristics are mostly the ones who support the idea of holding and taking part in festivals, based on what their kin did or instructed. In addition, there are always other groups who take a great deal of tangible or intangible benefits from traditional dictated conduct. To make it clear, pilgrims have to sacrifice a sheep annually. Thereby, creating a great market for butcheries and ranchers that are managed by the governmental sector in Iran.
On the other hand, due to the technological improvement many people ascent to a higher social stratum, that is not eager to associate with the lower traditional crust. To make an example, in the Arab region it is common that local people do not use spoons and forks while eating, especially in religious festivals. However, in the modern world, this kind of human behavior has a great contradiction with normative conduct. Pertinent to the aforementioned reason and example, in Iran mosques used to be fully carpeted and people could not enter the holy places with shoes. However, in recent years, the belief of religious people could align with citizens’ convenience. Since many cannot stand to sit on the ground for long hours.
To sum up, despite the compelling reasons of both sides of the argument, I opt to vigorously support the idea of being flexible and open to changes, not only regarding traditional festivals but also in other aspects of life. Therefore, we can enjoy the festivals in our way while keeping our history alive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...their corresponding impacts has sparked a long-running dispute among old-fashion and sophistic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd to sit on the ground for long hours. To sum up, despite the compelling reason...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16860465116 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86889003209 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8302868493 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211098307258 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576251747134 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397729034657 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108171552781 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420310540146 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.